Re: 95 Neshaps

["ROB FORREST" <ROB_FORREST.RSO#u#MAILROOM@rsomacserver.rso.upenn.edu>]

                      RE>95 Neshaps                                2/6/95
The NMSS Licensee Newsletter from Sept/Oct 1994 p.7 addresses the status of the
Neshaps battle between the NRC and EPA.  As of the date of that publication,
nothing has changed.  NESHAPS reporting to the EPA is still required.  No
mention of new requirements are made.  The contact person is Phyllis Sobel,
NMSS, (301) 415-6714.
Enjoy.

Rob Forrest
UPENN

---------------------------á-íb““----
Date: 2/6/95 12:17 PM
To: ROB FORREST
From: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Received: by rsomacserver.rso.upenn.edu with SMTP;6 Feb 1995 12:14:52 +1000
Received: from romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu [128.174.74.24]) by
vixen.cso.uiuc.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA14529; Mon, 6 Feb 1995
11:13:10 -0600
Received: by romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (NX5.67d/NeXT-2.0)
	id AA03265; Mon, 6 Feb 95 11:12:59 -0600
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 11:12:59 -0600
Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.90.950206105919.1545A-100000@post.its.mcw.edu>
Errorud‰OG melissa@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Reply-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.e!u
Originator: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Sender: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: "Patrick D. Beyer" <pbeyer@post.its.mcw.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: 95 Neshaps
X-Listserver-Version: 6.0 -- UNIX ListServer by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment:  Radiation Safety Distribution List 


I have been requested to ask the following:

Is the requirement for NESHAP reporting still inforce?

If Yes : Does anyone know if they are planning to repeal it?

Are there any reporting changes (style or format)?

and 

Has any body reported any problems from the EPA with thier 94 submissions?



Thanks,

Pat Beyer
Medical College of Wisconsin