[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Thorium gas mantles
- To: SMTP PMDFADDR <MAILGATE@ADDRMELON.CA.BOEING.COM>
- Subject: Thorium gas mantles
- From: Bruce Pickett <SHEA136@KGV2.bems.boeing.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
- Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 0
- Importance: normal
- Mr-Received: by mta MELON; Relayed; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 11:02:30 -0700
- Priority: normal
- Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 11:09:19 -0700
- Resent-From: SHEA136@KGV2.bems.boeing.com
- Resent-Message-Id: <9506121819.AA08795@atc.boeing.com>
- Resent-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Ua-Content-Id: Thorium gas mantles
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;MRP$12JUN199511022321]
For decades, HPs have stood up before classes and the public while holding
onto gas lantern mantles and saying "See these? They're radioactive!" But in
the past year or two, the mantles have no longer contained radioactive
materials (I suspect that the mantle manufacturers got tired of being held up
as examples by the nuclear industry, so they eliminated the use of thorium).
Can anyone answer these questions:
(1) Have all manufacturers of gas mantles stopped using thorium?
(2) I've always thought that the thorium was intentionally used to increase
the luminosity of the burning gas mantles; what has replaced the thorium and
is it as effective in brightening the light?
(3) In a thorium gas mantle, what percentage of the thorium burns off and
what remains in the mantle ash?
(4) What is considered to be an "average" activity for thorium mantles and how
much variability is there?
Thanks,
Bruce Pickett