[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
Al Tschaeche wrote:
"Date: 10 Oct 1995 08:46:08 MDT
From: "ALDEN N TSCHAECHE" <XAT@inel.gov>
Subject: Standards of Professional Responsibility - Another Case
Nothing happens. No one has filed a complaint with the AAHP
against the CHP. Nothing should happen unless some person files a
complaint. No, unless the CHP enters into a relationship with one
of them. Then, if I were the "other CHP", I would discuss the
matter with the CHP and determine for myself what kind of a
relationship we would have. If a complaint were brought before
the AAHP, I think confidntiality by the AAHPshould still be in
place. I would not be willing to take the NRC's word and
certainly wouldn't believe anything I read or heard in the
media. I wouldn't do anything.
With respect to Les Slaback's latest note about the AIHA (I am
also a member ofthe AIHA although not a CIH), I think someone
must assist CHPs in keeping their agreement to abide by the
Standards of Professional Responsibility -- if the CHPs agree to
have them at all. Once the agreement is made, there is much
benefit in having a system in place to assist those making the
agreement to keep it.
Unfortunately, we know that it is human nature not to keep
agreements. If everyone kept all the agreements there are out
there (laws, regulations, unspoken, etc., etc.), we wouldn't need
lawyers, prisons, police, etc., etc. But, we do need someone to
assist us in keeping our agreements. That's what the AAHP can do
if it wishes. I'm disappointed that the AIHA will not assist its
CIHs in this matter. If the AAHP does it right, there shouldn't
be much expence in providing the assistance."
==============================================================
Response:
Remember that the AIHA is to the CIH as the HPS is to the CHP.
The AIHA does not certify, nor does the HPS - both are
professional societies. Yes, most CIHs are members of the AIHA,
and most CHPs are members of the HPS. It appears that the AIHA
has changed its policy to act in the same manner as the HPS with
respect to the enforcement of its code of ethics. In neither
case is membership in the professional society a prerequisite for
certification. The two should not be confused.
Has the HPS ever taken action against a member for a violation of
its Code of Ethics?
George J Vargo
gj_vargo@pnl.gov