[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]- Caveman NORM dos

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: Re[2]- Caveman NORM dos
From: Chris Davey <cdavey@med.phys.ualberta.ca>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 11:17:33 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199510241655.KAA25875@mailhost.lanl.gov>

Creation...   .... Evolution

Two points:

1	Let's not be insulting, it degrades the professionalism

2	Millions or billions of years, or just 6,000 - let's use the 
theory of long, long timescales for discussion, and see where it leads.  
Any other approach upsets so many preconceived notions that 
interpretation of radiation levels and hazards would be impossible, IMO.

Chris Davey, RSO  Cross Cancer Institute

References:
- Re: Re[2]- Caveman NORM dos
  - From: chatho@lanl.gov (Charles Thomas)

Prev by Date: Re: 5 rem (50 mSv)/y as BRC Level
Next by Date: RADSAFE "Netiquette"
Prev by thread: Re: Re[2]- Caveman NORM dos
Next by thread: Re: Re[2]- Caveman NORM dos
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread