[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: furlough
The government furlough is hard enough to endure and one
would expect comments like those I have seen posted on
radsafe to appear on "hate" radio talk shows.
The furlough is a political game, and federal workers are
being used as pawns. I do not think radsafe is a forum to
make such comments as those that I have seen recently and
especially from someone as well respected (or was well
respected by me) as Dr. Vetter.
I believe that radsafe should stick to what it does best -
serve as a forum for radiological information exchange, not
as a forum for "bashing" federal workers. I am really ashamed
to be part of such a community!
Stuart M. Altman
U.S. Department of Energy
Defesne Programs (DP-34)
STUART.ALTMAN@DP.DOE.GOV
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: furlough
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu_at_internet at x400PO
Date: 11/16/95 2:35 PM
Message authorized by:
: rvetter@mayo.edu_at_internet at x400PO
Errors-To: melissa@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Originator: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Listserver-Version: 6.0 -- UNIX ListServer by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Radiation Safety Distribution List
To: IN14994 --POST
*** Reply to note of 11/16/95 13:16
From: R.J.Vetter
Subject: furlough
It makes a big difference in mail volume, doesn't it. Perhaps we should
consider a proposal to permanently furlough some govt. radiation divisions.
I will be meeting with the Texas Panhandle Chapter Feb 21 in Amarillo and
the
North Texas Chapter Feb 22 in Dallas. Are you planning to attend one or
both
meetings?
***************************************************************
* Richard J. Vetter, Ph.D. CHP email: rvetter@mayo.edu *
* Phone: 507-284-4408 Fax 507-284-0150 *
***************************************************************