[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"POLLUTION FREE"
Well, how about
No carbon dioxide, no NOx, no unburned hydrocarbons, no soot, flyash,
acid rain, no smoke, no smog, no noise, negligible gaseous radioactive
releases, all solid radwaste is buried and secured from human contact
for 300 years. Our liquid effluents have not been found to
concentrate significantly in the aquatic life in the rivers, lakes or
oceans. Oh yes, what about that spent fuel? While it is a problem,
it cannot be considered pollution. If the public ever gets over its
unfounded fear of radiation (or something equally dramatic happens)
the spent fuel can be safely stored underground virtually
forever--still, no pollution.
Let's turn some attention to the beginning of the fuel cycle. Look at
the health hazards and loss of life associated with coal mining.
Uranium is mined too, you say? That's true of course, but compare the
volumes of material needed to generate power with the two fuels. With
more volume (thousands of times more) comes more workers working more
hours accumulating more health detriment and endangerment to life and
limb each day. Of 4000 U.S. miners studied, there were 159 fatal lung
cancers up to 1974 versus only 25 expected in populations not exposed
to radon daughters found in mines. With high fuel voume comes high
volumes of waste. At a nuclear plant, 40 years worth of spent fuel can
fit into a pool smaller (but deeper) than one at the local YMCA. That
same pool would be filled to overflowing in just minutes or hours with
the ash coming out of a coal plant. You want to talk about gaseous
and solid radwaste? What radioactive materials do you suppose are
bound up in all that coal? How about all the daughters of the natural
decay chains--alpha emitters.
Look at NCRP report 94, 1987 for a breakdown of doses to various
tissues of the body from exposure to natural nuclides. This same
information is in "The Health Physics and Radiological Health
Handbook", Bernard Schleien, 1992 on page 5. It refers to natural
nuclides inhaled and contained in the body. Uranium and Thorium and
their daughters in the body? How do those get there? Some get there
by erosion and water transport to the food chain but I'd be willing to
bet that they mainly get there by inhaling the effluents from coal
plants.
To go on,(and on) there are other carcinogens released by burning coal
which cause cancer deaths. Namely, Cd, Ni, Cr, As, Be. The risks of
dying from cancer induced by carcinogenic agents released as a
consequence of burning coal are far higher (thousands of times higher)
than those possible from running nuclear power plants AND burying all
the high level wastes. If you would like to read more on the topic,
read chapter 15 of "THE RISK ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL and HUMAN
HEALTH HAZARDS" edited by Dr. Dennis J. Paustenbach, Copyright 1989 by
John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
There is a bounty of relative risk information contained comparing the
deaths per GWe-yr of nuclear, coal and photovoltaic power generation.
If you cannot find a copy, I can send some out by fax or snail mail on
request. If you would like copies mailed to you, I would appreciate
an SASE.
Paul Vitalis
byrpv@ccmail.ceco.com
Address
Attn: Paul Vitalis
Byron Station
Rad Protection
4450 N. German Church Rd.
Byron, Il 61101
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Blue Ice & [I-131]
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at INTERNET
Date: 11/29/95 11:05 AM
Would you expand upon the concept of "pollution free", please?