[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Ward Valley
The following appeared in the NCCHPS Newsletter and is repeated here at the
suggestion of Al Tschaecke.
PRESS RELEASE REGARDING WARD VALLEY forwarded by Joel Cehn
HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 15, 1996--US Ecology Chairman Jack
Lemley today condemned what he called a "transparent political act by
the Clinton Administration to indefinitely delay a federal decision on
the Ward Valley low-level radioactive waste disposal project beyond
the November presidential election." Lemley's response follows a Feb.
14 Interior Department announcement that no land transfer decision
will occur before the previously uninvolved Department of Energy
undertakes new studies that will last a year or more, followed by a
third round of federal environmental impact reviews. The Interior
Department announcement follows a recent California Supreme Court
decision upholding a license granted to US Ecology by the state
Department of Health Services in 1993, and a May 1995 National
Academy of Sciences (NAS) report that recommended additional study but
repudiated claims of project opponents and concluded that
construction and operation could proceed.
"Unless reversed, this misguided federal intrusion will effectively
terminate the Ward Valley project and ultimately unravel more than 15
years of coordinated effort by the states to implement the federal
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act," Lemley predicted. The Act,
passed by Congress in 1980, was based on the recommendations of a
National Governor's Association task force, on which then-Governors
Bill Clinton and Bruce Babbitt served. Lemley took particular
exception to the blatant falsehood, originally put forth in President
Clinton's recent veto of the Balanced Budget Act, that Congress had
sought to transfer the Ward Valley site with no environmental
safeguards. "In fact," Lemley noted, "extensive public health and
environmental safeguards are already in place as a result of existing
federal and state regulations, more than 130 detailed state license
conditions, and requirements of the state's Environmental Impact
Report, all of which have been upheld by the courts."
Congress acted to conclude the land transfer after negotiations
between the Interior Department and the State of California broke
down concerning Secretary Babbitt's demands that the state grant
Interior a future role overseeing how it carried out specific NAS
recommendations. By law, oversight of California's regulatory
program is the responsibility of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission. The Interior Department has no statutory authority, and
no expertise in radiation safety matters.
The Department of Energy's statutory role regarding commercial
low-level radioactive waste is to assist the states in the
development of sites. "DOE's interference in the State of
California's program is in direct conflict with their narrowly
assigned role under the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act, and we
will not assist its misconduct," Lemley commented. "The Clinton
Administration has placed political expediency above the law, the
public health of Californians and the general welfare of the nation.
The future of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy is now in the
hands of Congress," Lemley concluded. Low-level radioactive wastes
are produced by electric utilities, hospitals, universities,
biotechnology companies and other industries. More than 2,200
entities are licensed to use radioactive materials in California,
which has been the largest waste producer west of the Mississippi
River. Waste is currently accumulating in hundreds of urban
locations pending a solution to the state's disposal needs.
Contact: Hill and Knowlton, Inc., George Paris, 415/781-2430