[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Air Crew Rad Workers
It would be very interesting to see a response from some of the many
regulatory bodies that monitor this forum for their perspective on
this question. I would agree that monitoring over a year would provide
a significant amount of data, that can be stratified to identify
exposure for various altitude flights over time as well as to what
areas the flights accumulate the most exposure. It is still my opinion
that there is no regulatory requirement to monitor these individuals.
If there were one would expect that some agency would have already
jumped into the fray. It just might be that the regulators don't know
if it is within their jurisdiction to require the monitoring. I have
read, and it has been mentioned here before that the astronauts can
and have picked up some very high exposures during their missions.
They are provided monitoring, I assume on all flights. Are they
regulated by anyone? Are their records examined and a lifetime record
maintained. That would be interesting information.
Regards all,
Sandy Perle
Supervisor Health Physics
Florida Power and Light Company
Nuclear Division
(407) 694-4219 Office
(407) 694-3706 Fax
sandy_perle@email.fpl.com
HomePage: http://www.wp.com/54398/home.html
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed here are mine alone
I can think of a number of cogent reasons why monitoring of air crews
should be done. First, there may well be a regulatory requirment
since exposures may exceed 25% of the annual MPD. But that
notwithstanding, it would be nice to accumulate the data for research
purposes, a basis secondary to ensuring that exposures are minimized.
Adjustment of flight schedules can reduce exposures to individuals.
You should refer to the editorial I wrote in Health Physics about 15
years ago entitled "What Is Occupational Exposure" for some other
insights.
Ron Kathren