[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "CONTAMINATED" SHIPMENTS

To: Charles Anthony Giomuso <cag7@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: "CONTAMINATED" SHIPMENTS
From: MCNELLY ROBERT <mcnelly@spot.Colorado.EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 03:07:36 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199608270309.UAA18297@dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com>

At Colorado@Boulder We check the "Final sorce container" for the safty of
our researchers. Who dont understand the sinifigance of contamination from
viALS. wE CITE THEM FOR CONTAMINATION AND WE CHECK ALL VIALS-INSIDE PIGS
TO LIMIT THE POTENTAL FOR CONTAMINATION, AND BECOUSE OF POLITICS WHEN
CONTAMINATION IS FOUND .The opinions expressed above are my own, and have
not been reviewed orAPPROVED OF BY THE uNIVERSIY OF cOLORADO

On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, Charles Anthony Giomuso wrote:

> The NRC only requires that the external package be wipe tested and not 
> the "final source container".  Sounds like you took it a step farther 
> when you did not need to.
> 
> Chuck
>

References:
- Re: "CONTAMINATED" SHIPMENTS
  - From: cag7@ix.netcom.com (Charles Anthony Giomuso)

Prev by Date: Re: NRC Final Rule: Reporting Requirements for Unauthorized
Next by Date: Re: Truck-scale scrap detection systems
Prev by thread: Re: "CONTAMINATED" SHIPMENTS
Next by thread: Re: "CONTAMINATED" SHIPMENTS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread