[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on Nuclear Energy
Although my experiences and academic background pales in comparison to Bob
Flood, Sandy Perle, and Morton Goldman (and I certainly can't add anymore to the
excellent responses posted by them already), (and this being Friday p.m.) I
would like to add a different spin to the following questions posed...
>1. No satisfactory method has been found to halt nuclear proliferation or
>prevent diversion of nuclear material by subversive or terrorist elements.
>2. The costs and problems associated with decommissioning nuclear power plants
>have not been properly analyzed or accounted for in the costs of nuclear power
>and governments are using taxpayers' money to subsidize nuclear power.
>3. No satisfactory method has been found to guarantee safe operation of nuclear
>power plants in the event of employee negligence or sabotage.
If similar questions were posed to different industries (say airlines), what
sort of responses can we expect to receive?
1. No satisfactory method has been found to halt proliferation of terrorism or
prevent terrorist from placing explosive devices on passenger planes or
launching missiles against them.
2. The costs and problems associated with guaranteeing airline passenger safety
has never been fully assessed. Air travel is so inherently unsafe (...if God
wanted man to fly, especially at or near the speed of sound...) that government
is using taxpayers' money to subsidize airline industry by installing new air
traffic radars and conduct research (i.e. NASA) to increase air safety.
3. No satisfactory method has been found to guarantee safe operation of air
planes in the event of employee negligence or sabotage.
And so on. I'm sure you all could expand on the subject. We all have been
reading and watching news of tragic airline accidents around the world, but it
has not stopped people from traveling by air. I'm quite certain many of the
anti-nukes travel by air to their protest marches. If the same level of safety
criteria applied to non-Soviet era nuclear power plants are applied to airlines,
chances are that all air travel would have been banned years ago (and anti-nukes
would have to walk to their protest sites). Bottom line is as often stated,
there is no guarantee in life. I, for one, am very glad for the conveniences
provided by the modern technologies, and I am willing to pay for it. If not for
the modern technologies, statistically I would have died years ago, sick
(probably with sore feet), malnourished, and with all my teeth rotted away.
Tosh Ushino
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
ushinot@songs.sce.com