[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tritium editorial





On Thu, 26 Sep 1996 rick_strickert@pc.radian.com wrote:

> There is an interesting editorial in Science (13 Sep 96) by Harold Agnew
> regarding the question of where to get replacement tritium for our
> nuclear weapons once US stockpiles decay.  Agnew discusses the pros and
> cons of four sources:
> 
>      1. A DOE-built combination production/power reactor;
>      2. An DOE-built accelerator;
>      3. Canadian surplus; or,
>      4. Russian stockpile and surplus.
> 
> According to Agnew, buying foreign tritium will prevent a $2B "fleecing
> of America" and contribute to world stability.
> 
Speaking (E-mailing?) of units; the above should be 2 G$, not $2B.
Les Fraley



> Rick
> 
> Richard G. Strickert, Ph.D.          |    "Education is what survives
> Radian International, Austin, TX     |     when what has been learnt
> 512-310-5259, FAX 512-244-0160       |        has been forgotten."
> Internet: rick_strickert@radian.com  |         -  B.F. Skinner
>  ---> "All written IMHO." <---       |
> 
>