[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tritium editorial
On Thu, 26 Sep 1996 rick_strickert@pc.radian.com wrote:
> There is an interesting editorial in Science (13 Sep 96) by Harold Agnew
> regarding the question of where to get replacement tritium for our
> nuclear weapons once US stockpiles decay. Agnew discusses the pros and
> cons of four sources:
>
> 1. A DOE-built combination production/power reactor;
> 2. An DOE-built accelerator;
> 3. Canadian surplus; or,
> 4. Russian stockpile and surplus.
>
> According to Agnew, buying foreign tritium will prevent a $2B "fleecing
> of America" and contribute to world stability.
>
Speaking (E-mailing?) of units; the above should be 2 G$, not $2B.
Les Fraley
> Rick
>
> Richard G. Strickert, Ph.D. | "Education is what survives
> Radian International, Austin, TX | when what has been learnt
> 512-310-5259, FAX 512-244-0160 | has been forgotten."
> Internet: rick_strickert@radian.com | - B.F. Skinner
> ---> "All written IMHO." <--- |
>
>