Re: SI UNITS

[Robert_A_Jones@RL.gov]

     I have heard this almost every year.  It may be true this time but, I 
     doubt it.
     
     Robert A. Jones
     Robert_A_Jones@RL.gov


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: SI UNITS
Author:  ssg_michael_williamson@ftdetrck-ccmail.army.mil at -MailLink
Date:    12/6/96 2:20 PM


          Fellow Radsafers,
               I have heard a rumor that beginning 1 Jan 97, that SI
          units will be the new standard in the U.S.  Is there any 
          truth to this?  If so, is there any NRC Policy Letter 
          stating this?
     
           Thanks for the help,
     
           Mike Williamson
Received: from mail.rl.gov by ccmail.rl.gov with SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 1.04b) id 2a880b40; Fri, 6 Dec 96 12:23:17 -0800
Received: from postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.11]) b
y touchet.rl.gov (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA11330; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 12:21:33 -0
800 (PST)
Received: from romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu [128.174.74.24]) by pos
toffice.cso.uiuc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA264846; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 14:2
0:21 -0600
Received: from localhost by romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (NX5.67d/NeXT-2.0)
	id AA19447; Fri, 6 Dec 96 14:20:15 -0600
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 96 14:20:15 -0600
Message-Id: <9611068499.AA849913970@ftdetrck-ccmail.army.mil>
Errors-To: melissa@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Reply-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Originator: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Sender: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: ssg_michael_williamson@ftdetrck-ccmail.army.mil
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: SI UNITS
X-Listserver-Version: 6.0 -- UNIX ListServer by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment:  Radiation Safety Distribution List