[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: America's future energy source?
- To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: America's future energy source?
- From: Bernard L Cohen <blc+@pitt.edu>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:10:47 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <32F12400.577@inel.gov>
I use electric heating with a heat pump and it is little more
expensive than gas heating, even though we pay 12.5 cents/Kw-h (after a
certain level, it drops to 4.5 cents, which is effectively what we pay
for heating). It wouldn't be hard to live with this and I suspect that
after a hundred years or so, we will all be heating electrically.
Bernard L. Cohen
Physics Dept.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Tel: (412)624-9245
Fax: (412)624-9163
e-mail: blc+@pitt.edu
On Thu, 30 Jan 1997, Alden Tschaeche wrote:
> Eric Denison wrote:
>
> > For electric power generation, yes. But until they can heat my house directly
> > with a small reactor, I want natural gas. Apologies to all of the utility
> > folks, but electric heat just doesn't cut it. Been there, done that, don't
> > want to go back.
>
> I live in Idaho Falls where the electric rates are probably the lowest
> in the USA (3.5 cents per kilowatt hour) and the houses are very well
> insulated all over. Most houses here are heated by electrical
> resistance wires in the ceilings. It's wonderful heat. Each room has
> its own thermostat. The heat is even. No air filters to change or
> clean. No fan noise. The electric bill for my 3000 sq.ft. house is
> never above $220/mo even in the winter when it can get to 40 below zero
> at night (but not often). My wife likes the indoor temperature at or
> above 74 degrees F. I have had gas forced air heat in previous houses
> and hate it for all the reasons I like electric heat. So, we have had
> different experiences that have shaped our points of view. Vive le
> difference. Al xat@inel.gov
>