[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: textbook correct?
Mornin' to all from the not-so-sunny South.
The issue of cancer causation by diagnostic exposure to radiation
again raises its ugly head. We must all remember that a few
case-control epidemiological studies have demonstrated (?)
statistically significant associations between cancer and diagnostic
exposure. It is interesting that no cohort studies have confirmed
these results. Further, these results show only an association, and
are not proof of cause and effect. Finally, all of the exposures in
question occurred years to decades ago, when patient doses were
substantially higher than they are now. There are no data showing
that current diagnostic exposures are in any way harmful. A recent
summary is in "Radiation Risk--A Primer" published in 1996 by the
American College of Radiology.
By the way, can you provide author and title of the textbook in
question. I want to know what to avoid.
======================================================================
S. Julian Gibbs, DDS, PhD Voice 615-322-3190
Professor of Radiology FAX 615-322-3764
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville TN 37232-2675 Internet julian.gibbs@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
======================================================================