[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PC incident at Oak Ridge
I think this is an important issue that I haven't seen addressed in
many years. There are American National Standards Institute standards
for protective clothing, including fire resistance, etc. One of the
issues is how to clean protective clothing and how or how often to
restore fire resistance to materials which lose this capability
through cleaning. I don't know how Oak Ridge cleans their PCs, but
the description seems to indicate that this clothing was more
flammable than expected. IMO, this could easily be due to the manner
of cleaning, both from the aspect of any retardent being removed
during cleaning, and cleaning material residues. Dry-cleaning of PCs
is often more cost-effective, and for many contaminants more
chemically effective, but if not done properly can leave flammable
residues in the clothing. I know I smelled the "lighter fluid" on
many a pair of PCs while generator diving or crawling around in pipe
trays, etc., while the arc-cutters were doing their thing.
V/R
GRCicotte
george_cicotte@health.ohio.gov.us
============================
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 16:49:28 -0500
From: Joyce Davis <JOYCED@DNFSB.GOV>
Subject: Protective Clothing flammability
. . . an employee at Oak Ridge was fatally burned while using a
cutting torch . . . flammability of cotton and other anti-c clothing
normally used in industrial facilities. . . Where can further
information on this subject be found ? It seems this issue will arise
more and more as nuclear and radiological facilities are demolished.
Are there standards committees wortking on such issues ? . . .
==============================
From: Doug Turner <turners@earthlink.net> . . . . both Oyster Creek
and TMI used a protective clothing spec that included flammability for
cloth coveralls. . . . Welders also had to wear leathers, because
cloth coveralls would smoulder even though they would not sustain
combustion. . . . There was some legislation about clothing
flammability and the industry cleaned up its act somewhat, so everyone
may have thought the problem was solved. GPU should have the
specifications and test results on file.
Doug Turner <turners@earthlink.net>