[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sr-89 Inpatients
Sr-89ers:
I apologize if my initial response to the question was a litle too
flippant. In my defense, that is what our manual states and - to my
knowledge - all of our Sr-89 administrations have been outpatients.
What worries me, now that the subject has been raised, is that they
will not tell me if they do an inpatient Sr-89. I think the
precautions you have discussed are appropriate, considering the
potential for contamination and the long half-life. The situarion is
midway between I-131 and I-125, with little or no external exposure.
I was involved with one patient who had received P-32 and then went
to surgery a couple of days later. They covered the floor with
absorbent paper and wore rings. I collected body fluids and
contaminated waste and held them for decay. There wasn't any
contamination of hte room or instuments. Universal precautions are a
blessing since they don't need to do anything different to avoid
radioactive contamination.
We have also seen the OR procedures involving Tc-99m. The NM people
had to be convinced that this was different than injecting someone
for a bone scan and sending them back to their room. We can hold
waste materials for decay, but surgical specimens are different. I
found out ina hurry that Pathology guards them as jealously as we
guard the radioactivity. We agreed to set up a shielded area in
Pathology to receive these specimens and hold for decay.
As usual, the discussion on Radsafe is informative. I greatly
appreciate the interaction and hope to add something useful as well
as benefiting from it.
Ken
Ken Douglass,
RSO
West Virginia university
Kenneth H. Douglass, Ph.D.
Director, Radiation Safety
West Virginia University
West Virginia University Hospitals
PO Box 9006
Morgantown WV 26506
(304) 293-1549
(304) 293-4529 (fax)
kdouglas@wvu.edu