[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Japanese Accident
Alex Zapantis wrote:
> Don't be too quick to "call the kettle black." I have seen equally misleading
> quotes from the nuclear industry. My favourite relates to "minor radioactive
> aerosols and effluents" released from power reactors. I agree that the impact of
> these releases on the environment and on human health is minor, even negligible,
> but I would not call these releases "minor" due to the activities involved!
>
> Just my probably misinformed opinion!
No; it seems to agree completely with the "informed" media opinion: A
radiation hiccup is *major* because it happens at a nuclear plant (while an
event that is 1000's of times more detrimental to human health is of NO
interest - like a truck backfire in a city! or like drilling a water well and
creating a *continuous discharge* of actual, deadly, radioactivity - right
into peoples *homes*!? :-)
Regards, Jim Muckerheide
jmuckerheide@delphi.com
_______________________________________________________________________________
> Subject: Re: Japanese Accident
> From: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at mgdestmx01
> Date: 11/3/97 7:29 PM
>
> > A small amount of radiation were released into the
> >environment, he said.
>
> NO, it wasn't. A small amount of radioactivity, maybe. Or did they mean
> that a few alpha particles and six or seven gamma rays escaped into the woods?
>
> Alex Zapantis