Re: Commisioner Dicus' Speech

["Wesley M. Dunn" <WDUNN@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us>]

Jim, 

Other than expected misguided character assasination, what's your 
point?  An explanation of your understanding of Commissioner Dicus' 
viewpoint on regulating medicine and how it pertains to the IOM 
report might be useful.  But please add some facts and analysis.  An 
explanation of why the IOM totally ignored the charge of their 
contract from NRC would be very enlightening.

Wes


> Date sent:      Wed, 16 Apr 97 10:45:13 -0500
> Send reply to:  radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
> From:           JMUCKERHEIDE@delphi.com
> To:             Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
> Subject:        Re: Commisioner Dicus' Speech

> Will her office tell you that "the point" is to stick it to medicine in
> retaliation for the IOM report? 
> 
> Would you expect your representative to tell you that the "point" of a
> particular vote that stuck it to you was to sell it for some other more
> important vote (or bigger cash contribution :-) 
> 
> The entire Washington "industry" operates on "wondering" about "the point" of
> many things that you would never expect to get a straight answer for from the
> principals :-)  Why not among the most knowledgeable on radsafe?  :-) 
> 
> Regards, Jim Muckerheide
> jmuckerheide@delphi.com

*********************************************************************
Wesley M. Dunn, CHP                        512-834-6688
Deputy Director, Licensing                 512-834-6690 (fax)
(Texas) Bureau of Radiation Control        wdunn@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us
*********************************************************************