[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Related issue - patient



        Reply to:   RE>>Related issue - patient 

Barbara,

I thought that once a patient who is given a diagnostic dose or meets
therapeutic release limits, leaves the hospital, the radioactive materials
become either exempt or generally licensed.  So what is the legal problem? 
Should we keep all radiopharmaceutical patients under hospital arrest for 10
T1/2's???   %^)  "The devil in me, made me do it!"

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
Michael J. Bohan, RSO   |  e-mail: mike.bohan@yale.edu
Yale-New Haven Hospital |    Tele: (203) 785-2950
Radiological Physics    |     FAX: (203) 737-4252
20 York St. - WWW 204   |    As usual, everything I say may be plausibly
New Haven, CT    06504  |    denied at my employer's convenience ...
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
 

--------------------------------------
Date: 25/05/97 8:38 PM
To: Mike Bohan
From: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
In a message dated 97-05-23 15:46:05 EDT, Mike Bohan wrote:

<< I would recommend that the state rad. control programs purchase portable
MCA
 setups with a large portable shielded NaI detector (3" x 3").  They could
then
 acquire a spectrum and compare it against known radiopharmaceutical
spectrums to prevent having to wade through waste to recover Tc-99m
contaminated diapers,
 etc.  >>

As a matter of fact, our state program does have a portable MCA or two.  It
is still quite expensive to send someone out to a landfill,  especially when
some are over a hundred miles from the nearest inspection office, to say,
"yup, that's Tc-99m."  Far better if this waste never made it to the public
landfill, as legally it should not.
 
Barbara L. Hamrick
Los Angeles County - Radiation Management
BLHamrick@aol.com

------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by QuickMail.Yale.edu with SMTP;25 May 1997 20:33:26 -0400
Received: from postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.11])
	by mail-relay1.cis.yale.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA00943
	for <mike.bohan@yale.edu>; Sun, 25 May 1997 20:32:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu [128.174.74.24])
	by postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA256940;
	Sun, 25 May 1997 19:32:14 -0500
Received: from localhost by romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (NX5.67d/NeXT-2.0)
	id AA19507; Sun, 25 May 97 19:32:14 -0500
Date: Sun, 25 May 97 19:32:14 -0500
Message-Id: <970525202537_-961820058@emout15.mail.aol.com>
Errors-To: melissa@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Reply-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Originator: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Sender: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: BLHamrick@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: Related issue - patient 
X-Listserver-Version: 6.0 -- UNIX ListServer by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment:  Radiation Safety Distribution List