[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: an ethical issue?



     Sam:
     
     Good suggestion to "do something useful with your time."  I suggest 
     you might use YOUR time to learn to communicate in a courteous manner. 
     "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all" would be 
     a good starting point.
     
     Wade: I agree with you.
     
     Les


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: an ethical issue?
Author:  "K. K. S. Pillay" <s_pillay@lanl.gov> at -MailLink
Date:    7/28/97 10:14 AM


Wade:

Since you asked for other people's opinions, here is my advice to you.

First, "YOU ARE OUT OF YOUR TREE."
Second, do something useful with your time.

Sam
==========



>Group:
>Sohei Kondo, in his book, Health Effects Of Low-Level Radiation, Chapter
>2, page 22; Medical Physics Publishing, Madison WI. 1993, states that
>"According to the IAEA 100,000-200,000 excess abortions were performed
>throughout western Europe after the Chernobyl accident."
>He cites Ketchum, LE, Lessons of Chernobyl: SNM members try to
>decontaminate world threatened by fallout. Part 1 [Newsline]. J. Nucl.
>Med., 28, 413-422, 1987 as the source of this data.
>
>In the August issue of Health Physics, 73(2), 378-382, there is a note
>by Kristin Shrader-Frechette and Lars Persson titled "Ethical Issues in
>Radiation Protection."
>
>Curiously they make no mention of these abortions.
>
>I wonder if they do not see an abortion, induced by fear of radiation
>exposure, as an ethical issue.
>
>It seems to me that it is.
>
>Such fear of course arises from the official ICRP/NCRP position that
>there is no threshold for radiation induced cancer and teratogenesis.
>
>I wonder what opinions others may have on this matter?
>
>--
>Wade
>
>mailto:hwade@triax.com
>
>H.Wade Patterson
>1116 Linda Lane
>Lakeview OR 97630
>ph 541 947-4974


Received: from mail.rl.gov by ccmail.rl.gov with SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 1.04b) id 3dcb80a0; Mon, 28 Jul 97 08:17:31 -0700
Received: from postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.11]) b
y touchet.rl.gov (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA22855; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 08:15:52 
-0700 (PDT)
Received: from romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu [128.174.74.24])
	by postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA134280;
	Mon, 28 Jul 1997 10:14:31 -0500
Received: from localhost by romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (NX5.67d/NeXT-2.0)
	id AA16883; Mon, 28 Jul 97 10:14:30 -0500
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 97 10:14:30 -0500
Message-Id: <v03102804b0027527966f@[128.165.212.15]>
Errors-To: melissa@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Reply-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Originator: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Sender: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: "K. K. S. Pillay" <s_pillay@lanl.gov>
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: an ethical issue?
X-Listserver-Version: 6.0 -- UNIX ListServer by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment:  Radiation Safety Distribution List