[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Patient release, have you got rid of in-house therapy at yourplace per ...

To: "radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: Patient release, have you got rid of in-house therapy at yourplace per ...
From: William Lorenzen <LORENZEN_W@A1.TCH.HARVARD.EDU>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 07:38:22 EST
A1-Type: MAIL
Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
Hop-Count: 0
Importance: normal
In-Reply-To: <971009180506_519911396@emout18.mail.aol.com>
Mr-Received: by mta AREEL; Relayed; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 07:46:25 -0500 (EST)
Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 07:46:00 EST
Priority: normal
Ua-Content-Id: E2508ZXBGB419M
X400-Mts-Identifier: [;52647001017991/7145156@HUB]

Excuse me but we now have 30 Agreement States...  Massachusetts became an AS on 
29 March 1997.

Not only is the patient rule of interest, but what are your opinions on the 
revision of Part 35?  Performance - Risk based vs. the present prescriptive 
regs.  What are the views of the SNM & HPS on this proposed change?

The revision of the patient release criteria could be a minor issue compared to 
what the total revision could bring!

Looking for discussion,

William Lorenzen
Children's Hospital
Boston, MA

617-355-7516
lorenzen_w@a1.tch.harvard.edu

References:
- Re: Patient release, have you got rid of in-house therapy at your place per ...
  - From: Ccja@aol.com

Prev by Date: Radioactive assassinations
Next by Date: RE: Radioactive assassinations
Prev by thread: Re: Patient release, have you got rid of in-house therapy at your place per ...
Next by thread: Possible provenance of "low levels of radiation"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread