[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RADSAFE rules

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: RADSAFE rules
From: Chris Hawkins <chawkins@inet.guthrie.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:59:32 -0500
Organization: Guthrie Clinic / Robert Packer Hospital
References: <9801302159.AA17431@zelda.ehs.uiuc.edu>

Over the last year I have noticed twocategories of subjects, those of a
scientific/technical nature, including the technicalities of regulations,
and those of a more societal nature, dealing with issues of radiation in
society, society's (and our) reactions to news stories, etc.

With roughly dozens of posts daily, do RADSAFErs see any value in a
bifurcation according to content.  That is, separate lists for the
technical vs societal subjects??
--
o------------------------------------------------o
|                                                |
|   Chris Hawkins             717.882.4048       |
|   Radiation Oncology        717.882.5166 fax   |
|   Guthrie Clinic - RPH                         |
|   Sayre, PA   18840                            |
|                                                |
|   mailto:chawkins@inet.guthrie.org             |
|                                                |
o------------------------------------------------o

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RADSAFE rules
  - From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@ix.netcom.com>

References:
- RADSAFE rules
  - From: "M. Woo" <melissa@zelda.ehs.uiuc.edu>

Prev by Date: RCRA Wastes
Next by Date: Re: RADSAFE rules
Prev by thread: RADSAFE rules
Next by thread: Re: RADSAFE rules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread