[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Stewart Article
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (IPM Return requested) (Receipt notification requested), blc+@pitt.edu (IPM Return requested) (Receipt notification requested)
- Subject: Re[2]: Stewart Article
- From: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- Date: 26 Feb 1998 11:34:56 -0700
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- Return-Receipt-To: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 0406534F5B5D0041-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: rfweine@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 26 Feb 1998 11:34:56 -0700
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 26 Feb 1998 11:34:56 -0700
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
Can't resist: if cancer latencies are 10 to 30 years, how can one tell
if "old people" are more susceptible? How old? And how can a
particular low-level exposure be separated from cumulative lifetime
exposure? This is also a flaw in the Rocketdyne study?
Clearly only my own opinion.
Ruth F. Weiner, Ph. D.
Transportation Systems Department
Sandia National Laboratories
Mail Stop 0718
P. O. Box 5800
Albuquerque, NM 87185-0718
505-844-4791
505-844-0244 (fax)
rfweine@sandia.gov
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Stewart Article
Author: blc+@pitt.edu at hubsmtp
Date: 2/26/98 9:15 AM
What does it mean to say that children and old people were
undr-represented? Data are given as a function of age at the time of the
bomb, so each age group is effectively a separate study. It doesn't matter
what number of people there were in each age group.
Bernard L. Cohen
Physics Dept.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Tel: (412)624-9245
Fax: (412)624-9163
e-mail: blc+@pitt.edu
On Thu, 26 Feb 1998, R. William Field wrote:
> Radsafers,
>
> Have you seen this article?
>
> Flawed radiation data puts old, kids at risk?
>
> Children and old people may be exposed to damaging levels of
> radiation from nuclear plants because of flawed data used to set
> safety limits, New Scientist magazine said Wednesday. A study by
> epidemiologist Alice Stewart showed the very young and the elderly
> were more sensitive to radiation damage than experts realized.
> Regulatory agencies estimate risks of exposure to radiation by using
> rates comparing cancer among people living in Nagasaki and Hiroshima
> in 1950, five years after the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on them, and
> people from other Japanese cities. Stewart said children and old
> people were under-represented among the survivors used in the data.
>
>
> See http://www.infobeat.com/stories/cgi/story.cgi?id=2553083802-62b
>
>
> Bill-field@uiowa.edu
>