[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: Stewart Article




     Can't resist: if cancer latencies are 10 to 30 years, how can one tell 
     if "old people" are more susceptible?  How old? And how can a 
     particular low-level exposure be separated from cumulative lifetime 
     exposure?  This is also a flaw in the Rocketdyne study?
     
     Clearly only my own opinion.
     
     Ruth F. Weiner, Ph. D.
     Transportation Systems Department
     Sandia National Laboratories
     Mail Stop 0718
     P. O. Box 5800
     Albuquerque, NM 87185-0718
     505-844-4791
     505-844-0244 (fax)
     rfweine@sandia.gov
     
     
     ______________________________ Reply Separator 
     _________________________________
     Subject: Re: Stewart Article
     Author:  blc+@pitt.edu at hubsmtp
     Date:    2/26/98 9:15 AM
     
     
     What does it mean to say that children and old people were
undr-represented? Data are given as a function of age at the time of the 
bomb, so each age group is effectively a separate study. It doesn't matter 
what number of people there were in each age group.
     
Bernard L. Cohen
Physics Dept.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Tel: (412)624-9245
Fax: (412)624-9163
e-mail: blc+@pitt.edu
     
     
On Thu, 26 Feb 1998, R. William Field wrote:
     
> Radsafers,
>
> Have you seen this article?
>
> Flawed radiation data puts old, kids at risk? 
>
> Children and old people may be exposed to damaging levels of
> radiation from nuclear plants because of flawed data used to set 
> safety limits, New Scientist magazine said Wednesday. A study by
> epidemiologist Alice Stewart showed the very young and the elderly 
> were more sensitive to radiation damage than experts realized.
> Regulatory agencies estimate risks of exposure to radiation by using 
> rates comparing cancer among people living in Nagasaki and Hiroshima 
> in 1950, five years after the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on them, and 
> people from other Japanese cities. Stewart said children and old
> people were under-represented among the survivors used in the data. 
>
>
> See http://www.infobeat.com/stories/cgi/story.cgi?id=2553083802-62b 
>
>
> Bill-field@uiowa.edu
>