[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: High count with LSCh
- To: "'o=internet;p=novartis;a=400net;c=ch;dda:RFC-822=radsafe(a)romul" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: RE: High count with LSCh
- From: "Campbell John CP USGR EXC" <john.campbell@cp.Novartis.com>
- Date: 18 Mar 1998 09:33:02 -0500
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Importance: normal
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: (2) (6) (3) (4) (11)
- Priority: normal
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 (22)
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [/PRMD=novartis/ADMD=400net/C=CH/;PPUSGR_EXSVR-980318143302Z-12646]
- X400-Originator: john.campbell@cp.exc.novartis.com
- X400-Received: by mta chnov-mta1 in /PRMD=novartis/ADMD=400net/C=CH/;converted ((1) (0) (10021) (7) (1) (0) (1), (1) (0) (10021) (7) (1) (0) (6), (1) (0) (10021) (7) (1) (0) (100), (2) (6) (3) (4) (11));Relayed ; 18 Mar 1998 14:34:11 +0000
- X400-Received: by mta PP-BANZAI-CHBS in /PRMD=novartis/ADMD=400net/C=CH/;Relayed ; 18 Mar 1998 15:33:37 +0100
- X400-Received: by mta PPUSGR-EXSVR4 in /PRMD=novartis/ADMD=400net/C=CH/;Relayed ; 18 Mar 1998 09:33:02 -0500
- X400-Received: by mta PPUSGR_EXSVR2 in /PRMD=novartis/ADMD=400net/C=CH/;Relayed ; 18 Mar 1998 09:33:02 -0500
This is a common problem when counting oils or other highly quenched samples.
The problem is photoluminescence. The solution is to chill the sample or
store in darkness for some time.
John Nash Campbell
----------
From: o=internet;p=novartis;a=400net;c=ch;dda:RFC-822=radsafe(a)romulus
.ehs.uiuc.edu;
Reply To: o=internet;p=novartis;a=400net;c=ch;dda:
RFC-822=radsafe(a)romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu;
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 1998 6:30 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: High count with LSCh
<<File: x400.txt>>
Received: from i3se0101.is.chbs.ciba.com (i3se0101.is.chbs [194.191.
169.76])
by mta3.is.chbs (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA31536;
Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:28:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: from romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu by i3se0101.is.chbs.ciba.com; (5.
65v3.2/1.1.8.2/12Mar96-0208PM)
id AA22416; Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:27:26 +0100
Received: (from server@localhost)
by romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA08748;
Tue, 17 Mar 1998 17:30:48 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 17:30:48 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <01bd51fb$bceafd80$5e2060c2@slip-66.wu-wien.ac.at>
Errors-To: melissa@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Reply-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Originator: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Sender: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: "Schoenhofer" <schoenho@via.at>
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: High count with LSCh
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: RADSAFE Distribution List
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by romulus.ehs.uiuc.
edu id RAA08748
Schoenhofer
Habichergasse 31/7
A-1160 Wien
AUSTRIA
Tel./Fax: +43-1-4955308
Mobiltel.: +43-664-3380333
e-mail: schoenho@via.at
-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: HALEEM MAHMOUD SAID <mshaleem@dpc.kfupm.edu.sa>
An: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Datum: Montag, 16. M=E4rz 1998 21:47
Betreff: High count with LSCh
>Hello safety netters
>
>I have this question regarding high count rate with the liquid
>scintillation counter. Whenever a sample of oil vacuum pump of
>anccelerator is counted I get high count rate with initial count.
>However, when the sample is counted again latter on, the response is
>numerical value, and the value keep decreasing when counted repeatedly
>over time until stalbilizes latter on like 24 hours latter. The same
>thing occurred when counting saliva samples. I was wondering if any of
>you could give an explanation for this situation either from past
>experience or an educated guess. Your help is very much appreciated.
>Thanks.
>
>
>Mahmoud Haleem
>KFUPM
>P.O.Box 1061
>Dhahran 31261
>Saudi Arabia
>mshaleem@dpc.kfupm.edu.sa
>------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
-----------------------
Dear Mr. Mahmoud,
Thanks for your contribution, which confirms an observation I made about =
a
year ago. I remember very well that we had a smear sample from the vicini=
ty
of a Fe-55 source. Since the area from which the smear sample was taken w=
as
lubricated, the smear sample contained some mineral oil. We also saw with
our Quantulus counters chemiluminescence (this counter offers the
possibility of measuring chemiluminescence independently of the sample). =
It
took several days to decay. We had no time to go further into details, bu=
t
it would be worthwhile to do it now. Do you have any further observation,
for instance what another RADSAFER suggested, to measure the original
mineral oil? Please contact me for further exchange at my personal e-mail
address.
In my opinion measurement of low beta-energy emitters is a very interesti=
ng
and useful application of liquid scintillation measurements. However in s=
ome
cases chemiluminescence might interfere.
Regards,
Franz