FW: Reply to Joe Ring about security/NRC

["Barlow, Agnes E." <BarlowAE@MASPO2.MAS.YALE.EDU>]

We seem to be continuing to have troubles with our email.  Here is one final 
attempt from me.  Joe's helpful info and my reply...  sorry if this is a 
duplicate for you.
Aggie
 ----------
From: Barlow, Agnes E.
To: Joseph P. Ring
Subject: Reply to Joe Ring about security/NRC
Date: Thursday,May 14,1998 3:49PM

I appreciate your efforts in working with the NRC on this issue and your 
help now to clarify.   [ I also appreciate the private email I received from 
others, with one in particular offering helpful information.]  I now 
understand that the NUREG/CR-6204 section of the memo referred to two 
questions which had information that might have been confusing for 
licensees.  The two questions will be rescinded so the regulations will be 
clearer.

I also now understand that the " aggregate quantity" issue in a lab with 
multiple unsecured containers might be evaluated akin to the unity rule.

This clarification aids me in my efforts to explain possible impact of the 
memorandum to interested parties here.

Again, thanks to all who responded.

Aggie
Agnes.Barlow@Yale.edu
203 737-2142
standard disclaimer
 ----------
From: Joseph P. Ring
To: radsafe
Cc: Agnes.Barlow
Subject: NRC - security of RAM -April 24th Memorandum
Date: Thursday,May 14,1998 2:46PM

 Not being from NRC but understanding the process I would like to take a
shot at responding to Aggie's questions.