Re: Response

[GACMail98@aol.com]

Mr. Helton,

If JM is correct, it would seem the health physics community pursues truth as
aggressively as your journalists and salesmen.

David K. Helton, (damm01@matrix.uti.com) writes:

<< YES, I do not like Mr. Ith’s article, nor a lot of journalists, nor 95% of
salesmen.
 
Salesmen make there living by selling items to customers. Salesmen mention
only points that help encourage the purchase. These are the good or neutral
points of the product NOT any of the negative points (would discourage a
potential buyer).
 
Journalists use the same technique that salesmen use. They use only material
which is deemed advantageous and NO information deemed NOT advantageous. >>

JM writes:

<<There is an article by one (or more) of the authors of Hatch et al in the
same issue in which wing et al appeared, plus some letter in a later issue.

Other than that, I'm not aware that anyone took the article seriously enough
to publish a critique.>>

Glenn
gacmail98@aol.com