[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Absence of radionuclides
MDC is not the lowest amount you can detect. I believe that you want to
use the DL (decision level) value for this - it essentially is the level
at which you can distinguish measurements above background. You should
not report "<MDC" as equivalent to radionuclide free. Your MDC does
have to be equal to or less than the limits in whatever table you use.
Beyond this, a measurement less than MDC or MDA does not mean that you
have demonstrated the absence of radionuclides. This is done, in part
by the DL (it is the 5% false positive calculation - I am not
remembering the other names for it).
Robert A. Jones Robert_A_Jones@rl.gov
Health Physicist phone: (509)376-8528
PFP Radiological Control fax: (509)373-4274
Hanford, WA Hanford Pager: 85-6559
-----Original Message-----
From: The Turners [SMTP:dwturners@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 1998 9:24 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: Absence of radionuclides
Hi Claude,
For nuclear power plants many of the licensee's use the minimum
detectable
concentration values in their Offsite Dose Calculation Manual to
demonstrate a specific isotope is "not present". This allows
establishing
a counting time for the specified percent uncertainty.
Procedures or
Technical specifications at older reactors sometimes designate a
specific
gross activity such as less than 100 ccpm with a thin window GM
or
equivalent as "no detectable activity".
Doug Turner <dwturners@earthlink.net>
At 11:36 AM 6/30/98 -0500, you wrote:
>The old 10CFR20 had a method in Appendix B to determine the
absence of any
>radionuclides in a mixture. If each 'absent' radionuclide was
less than
10% of
>it's MPC and the sum ratio of 'absent' radionuclides to their
respective MPCs
>were less than 25%, than those radionuclides were absent from
the mixture.
The
>new Part 20 requires that the absence of the radionuclides be
demonstrated.
>These appears to be another case of "if it's detectable, it's
there."
Have any
>NRC licensees had to 'demonstrate' the absence of radionuclides
in a
mixture?
>If so, how?
>
>Claude Flory
>Northeast Utilities
>floryca@gwsmtp.nu.com
>
>