[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Help for middle school student. -Reply
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (IPM Return requested) (Receipt notification requested), CAW@nrc.gov (IPM Return requested) (Receipt notification requested)
- Subject: Re[2]: Help for middle school student. -Reply
- From: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- Date: 01 Oct 1998 09:42:47 -0600
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- Return-Receipt-To: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 03CEC3613A2F7D7A-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: rfweine@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 01 Oct 1998 09:42:47 -0600
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 01 Oct 1998 09:42:47 -0600
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
I have to agree totally with Charlie about "Closing the Circle..." The book is
good for pictures and not much else. My long teaching experience taught ME that
students think the published word is sort of sacrosanct, so that the sort of
misinformation Charlie cites becomes part of the public lexicon about ionizing
radiation, fission, actinides, etc.
By the way, what happened to students' learning how to use a library??
Clearly only my own opinion.
Ruth Weiner
rfweine@sandia.gov
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Help for middle school student. -Reply
Author: CAW@nrc.gov at hubsmtp
Date: 10/1/98 6:37 AM
Kim,
Our reactions to "Closing the Circle on the Splitting of the Atom" are decidedly
different. One rotten line may not spoil a book, but it certainly made me pay
attention when I read that: "In general, the risks of adverse health effects are
higher when exposure is spread over a long period than when the same dose is
received at one time." I have no way of knowing whether this absurd statement
is
simply a gaff or is a measure of the writer's knowledge or intent. However, it
must
be by choice that the book addresses contamination at great length but offers
nothing to provide perspective about the associated risks. Certainly the reader
is
told nothing of the epidemiological studies which indicate that workers in
AEC/DOE facilities, who were much more highly exposed that were members of
the public, show no ill effects of radiation.
The book does have its virtues. It is slick, well illustrated, and
expensive-looking.
It provides a broad, but cursory, overview of DOE operations with a wealth of
good
pictures. The glossary provides a few chuckles by saying that "any plutonium
can
be used" for weapons production; calling U-235 "... the only fissile element;"
and
defining radioactivity as "... of, caused by, or exhibiting radioactivity."
Some health physicists may find this book useful or amusing, but I would not
recommend it for the general public, and certainly not for a middle school
student.
Charlie Willis
caw@nrc.gov
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html