[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NY Times Editorial on Marie Curie
One must remember that the leaches put on her forehead probably removed 30%
of the Radium. See episode 439 of the "Simpson's" for a reference.
Seriously, how could someone of that time deduce that she died from exposure
to external/internal radiation? I would like to see a "Probability of
Causation" calculation. We must be careful about attaching numbers to this
case. Numbers tend to imply precision and accuracy and I've never seen
facts to support such suppositions.
Sincerely,
Glen Vickers
glen.vickers@ucm.com <mailto:glen.vickers@ucm.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Lavera, Ron [SMTP:Ron.Lavera@nypa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 1998 7:39 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: RE: NY Times Editorial on Marie Curie
Radiation killed Mme Curie. She discovered Radium. She had much
less
Radium than expected. She must have received less radiation than
previously believed, therefore, this is another example of how the
regulations don't protect us. They should believe us when we say
that
radiation is BAD !
I believe that this is the mind set of the writer of the article.
The
writer is probably not aware that, assuming that she died of a
radiation
related illness, Mme. Curie worked with poorly shielded diagnostic
x-ray
machines in research and WW-I medical support etc.
I'm not sure if there was a breakdown in the communications loop,
i.e.
was the writer informed of these other relevant facts, or should the
writer have attempted to check into these type of issues before
submitting the article. Maybe the editor wanted it this way ?
If any of the press types out there have any comments, I would be
very
interested in hearing them.
... mine and mine alone ...
Ron LaVera
lavera.r@nypa.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: RADPROJECT@aol.com [mailto:RADPROJECT@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 1998 12:12 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: NY Times Editorial on Marie Curie
In a message dated 11/25/98 1:42:46 AM !!!First Boot!!!,
AIto@jfcr.or.jp
writes:
<< Mme Curie's internal dose due to radium has recently found to be
much
less than the maximum accepted concentration to the public. In
1995,
Mme
Curie's coffin was moved to Pantheon to be given France's highest
honour.
At that time, French Office of Ionization Radiation Control (ORPI)
had
measured radon concentration in her coffin. It was 360 Bq/m3 while
the
maximum accepted public concentration is 7000 Bq/m3. See further
details
in the article entitled "X-rays, not radium, may have killed
Curie",
Nature, Vol. 377, 14 September 1995 >>
I don't understand the logic of the above comparison. What does the
concentration of radon in the air of Mme. Curie's coffin derived in
part
from
her Ra-226 body burden have to do with the "maximum accepted public
concentration" [of Rn-222 in air] being stated as 7000 Bq/m3?
Research
going
back many decades has documented that radon is exhaled in the breath
of
a
living being [or released from a body after death] in some
relationship
to
internal deposition, which could be used to back calculate the
Ra-226
body
burden. I haven't seen the the reference cited above, but will do so
shortly,
and the article may address the point I raise.
However, it seems that the comment above related to the narrow point
of
body
burden vs. public ambient airborne radon exposure standards from
overall
environmental sources of radon is mixing apples with oranges in
regard
to the
issue of what was the level of Mme. Curie's radium body burden and
dose,
and
if her radium body burden contributed in any way to her death.
Stewart Farber
Director - Radium Experiment Assessment Project
19 Stuart St.
Pawtucket, RI 02860
Phone/FAX: (401) 727-4947 E-mail: radproject@usa.net
Web address: http://www.delphi.com/carsreap
The Radium Experiment Assessment Project is a project of the Center
for
Atomic
Radiation Studies, Inc., a not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and
subscription
information can be accessed at
http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and
subscription
information can be accessed at
http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html