Re: Humor for some, not for the overly sensitive

["Gregg Claycamp" <hgc2+@pitt.edu>]

Sure--Engineering feasibility has been considered in the estimation of many
older TLVs.  In other words, if "industry" said "we can't go that low", a
compromise might have been reached.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike McNaughton <MCNAUGHT@lanl.gov>
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Date: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: Humor for some, not for the overly sensitive


>At 06:55 PM 12/16/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>Before you assume that the TLVs reflect accurately the toxicity of
>>compounds, you should review the methods for deriving them.  The
>>correspondence between toxicity ranking and TLV ranking is not 1:1!
>
>That is interesting. Is it possible to summarize the essential distinction?
>
>Thanks, mike
>
>"Shlala gashle" (Zulu greeting meaning "stay safe") mike
>************************************************************************
>The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
>information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html