Re: Nuclear Proliferation

[Philip Hypes <phypes@nis5.lanl.gov>]

"preventive radiological safety" is a very good way to put it.
If there were some industrial practice that could potentially
result in a large amount of an alpha/beta/gamma/neutron
source being distributed over a significant area, that would
be an HP issue, wouldn't it?

phypes@nis5.lanl.gov

At 10:07 AM 1/13/99 -0600, you wrote:
>>Is it the role of the HPS or ANS to do this?  Is this really a 
>>radiological safety issue?  
>The link given was of interest to me. The work contexts and
>topics of interest among us Radsafers must vary a lot. And
>besides - I suppose it is a (preventive) radiological safety
>issue to understand nuclear proliferation? I believe that
>there is also some relation to the public image of anything
>"nuclear or radioactive".
>
>bjorn_cedervall@hotmail.com
>Any opinions expressed above are those of mine and may not necessarily 
>coincide with those of others.
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>************************************************************************
>The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
>information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
> 

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html