[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Inservice Inspection
One last point about reactor inservice inspections. Quoting from
the press release:
"the RI-ISI methodology is so focused, workers can reduce by up
to 75 percent the number of inspections they must perform in
radiological areas when compared to traditional inspection
methodology,'' he said. Therefore, RI-ISI can easily reduce
cumulative dose rates by 60 REM or more over a 10-year period..."
Remember that any technology that can reduce the number of
inspections is also going to cost a whole lot less ($ in addition
to dose). Therefore, in this day of cost competitive electricity
generation, risk-informed ISI has a significant $-savings. As
far as the dose savings, 60 person-rem over 10 years may not
sound like much, but when plants are scrambling to reduce
personnel exposure wherever possible and totals for a refueling
outage hover around 100 person-rem, 10 or so avoided is a pretty
big number (assuming a refueling every 20-odd months, yada
yada...)
And by the way, some ISI can be conducted when the plant is
running, such as inspections of safety injection piping, shutdown
cooling (RHR to you Westinghouse folks), as long as it's outside
containment. May not get done often due to schedules, personnel
availability, system operability requirements, etc.
Eric Goldin, not my employer's opinion, only mine
<goldinem@songs.sce.com>
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html