[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Radiation on Southern India Coast
01:35 AM ET 05/11/99
Radiation on Southern India Coast
By NEELESH MISRA=
Associated Press Writer=
AZEEKKAL, India (AP) _ More than 100,000 poor villagers are
living in a small coastal region of southern India that is
unusually rich in naturally occurring radioactive materials.
The result is a constant bombardment that bathes them with
yearly radiation doses up to 30 times higher than most people on
the planet experience, scientists say.
Most of the residents of the 77-square-mile stretch are only
vaguely aware of the situation. They go through their days eking
out livings oblivious to a war of words and statistics between
environmentalists who say the radiation is killing them and
government scientists who argue there is no reason to fear.
The argument is heating up over a nine-year government-financed
study to be made public later this year that comes to the unlikely
conclusion the area's inhabitants have become immune to the
radiation and may even be developing immunity to other diseases as
well.
Several international experts expressed skepticism about those
conclusions.
``I doubt very much that immunity to radiation damage occurs in
humans, and my experience tells me `watch out' with respect to
government-funded research,'' said one, John W. Gofman, professor
emeritus of molecular and cell biology at the University of
California, Berkeley.
``Next they will tell us about extraterrestrials,'' Gofman told
The Associated Press via e-mail.
The affected area, in Kerala state, is one of India's most
popular beaches for foreign tourists, who are unaware of the
questions about the ``black sands of Kerala.'' Middle-class Indians
from other parts of the country avoid the region because of
frequent news stories about the radiation.
``I know there are some sort of rays here,'' said Pushpasundar
Sukesan, a 63-year-old fisherman in Azeekkal, a village in the
radiation zone 1,350 miles south of New Delhi. ``We feel some kind
of attraction when we sleep on the sand. We feel weak.''
Other villagers say they get the same feeling when they sleep on
the sandy beaches or the mud-thatched floors of their huts.
Scientists involved in the survey say the background radiation
gives residents an annual dose of radiation 5 to 30 times higher
than normally recorded elsewhere on Earth. That is equivalent to
the radiation from 17 to 100 chest X-rays, according to the
Radiation Effects Research Organization in Hiroshima, Japan.
The glistening black sand on the beaches overlooking the roaring
Arabian Sea contains radioactive materials such as thorium, uranium
and monazite. India is trying to use the area's abundant deposits
of thorium to replace the uranium that powers its nuclear power
reactors.
There are similar radiation zones in southern China, Iran and
Brazil, but the Kerala coast is believed to be the only high
radioactivity region with a high population density. There are
about 5,200 per square mile here.
Hundreds of scientists and doctors divided the Kerala coast into
square mile grids and began studying the area in 1990. They checked
the 100,000 people in the zone plus 300,000 in areas where there is
no radiation and studied nearly 36,000 children for congenital
disorders. They also examined soil, air and water.
Doctors conduct regular medical examinations of the area's
residents and keep elaborate records of past medical histories of
each individual to keep track of health changes.
Now, they say they are looking at groundbreaking findings.
``The cancer incidence in the region is the same as in the whole
state,'' M. Krishnan Nair, director of the government's Regional
Cancer Center in the provincial capital, Trivandrum, said in an
interview. ``Since 1990, 2,500 people have been diagnosed with
cancer, and there are 300 new cases every year.''
Finding a normal incidence of cancer led the researchers to
conclude that ``there seems to be some sort of immunity, and the
radiation here could be producing certain changes in the system
which could make them more resistant to diseases,'' Nair said.
David A. Savitz, chairman of the Department of Epidemiology at
the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, said the
study is likely to excite supporters of a theory that prolonged
exposure to very low levels of radiation may stimulate the human
body to be more resistant.
But Savitz stressed it is difficult to draw a clear link between
background radiation and cancer incidence, since other
environmental or lifestyle factors could be at work.
At the same time, he said, experts also have been unable to link
background radiation to health problems.
Jim Plambeck of the University of Alberta, Canada, is among the
experts who are doubtful about the preliminary findings of the
government study. He said it can be very difficult to interpret
data on the incidence of disease.
David Hunter of the Harvard School of Public Health added, ``I
am not aware of any precedent for immunity from the health effects
of radiation.''
Environmental activists, meanwhile, contend the radioactive
minerals have, in fact, led to a spurt in cancer cases in the
region. Government experts and some local aid groups question the
accuracy of those studies, arguing the figures have been
exaggerated.
``Blood cancer, Down syndrome, epilepsy and genetic disorders
are common in this area, but the link with radiation is not yet
established,'' said P. Pradeep, an environmental activist who
formerly worked with the Bhabha Atomic Research Center, the hub of
atomic energy research in India which financed the Kerala study.
Still, Pradeep thinks, residents ought to be moved out of the
area, but they won't go. ``People here have more visible problems,
like their poverty. This is an invisible problem,'' he said.
Mario Iannaccaone,
Health Physicist
miannacc@dhhs.state.nh.us
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html