[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SI units

To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: SI units
From: Bernard L Cohen <blc+@pitt.edu>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 11:04:21 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <890B12B8398AD211BC6100805FA784A20237097C@es04snlnt.sandia.gov>


	Can I request one concession from the SI unit advocates? How
about letting us keep the working level (WL) and working level month (WLM)
units for radon progeny. They have a very clear significance, while the SI
equivalents, 2.08 x 10E-5 J/m**3 and 3.5 x 10E-3 Jh/m**3 mean nothing to
me

Bernard L. Cohen
Physics Dept.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Tel: (412)624-9245
Fax: (412)624-9163
e-mail: blc+@pitt.edu


************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html

Follow-Ups:
- Working Levels
  - From: Wes Van Pelt <vanpeltw@idt.net>

References:
- RE: SI units! -Reply
  - From: "Weiner, Ruth" <rfweine@sandia.gov>

Prev by Date: RE: Snoopy-- unfamiliar with jargon -Reply
Next by Date: Re[2]:CINDY (ver 1.4) Question
Prev by thread: RE: SI units! -Reply
Next by thread: Working Levels
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread