[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Article " Radiation Risk and Ethics"1
- To: wmach@bit-net.com
- Subject: Re: Article " Radiation Risk and Ethics"1
- From: Jim Muckerheide <jmuckerheide@delphi.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 15:41:05 -0400
- Cc: Chuck Adey <cwadey@aol.com>, Peter Reagan <plreagan@exxelinc.com>, steve.stamm@stoneweb.com, John Mayer <jamayer@wpi.edu>, Wayne Merritt <wjmerrit@dukeengineering.com>, "mwolf@tuvan.com" <mwolf@tuvan.com>, Mike McMahon <mvmcmahon@dukeengineering.com>, "koze@wpi.edu" <koze@wpi.edu>, "M. Kennedy" <mfkenned1@dukeengineering.com>, "chock@altran.com" <chock@altran.com>, Jeb DeLoach <deloarj@naesco.com>, Bruce Slifer <bcslifer@dukeengineering.com>, Jim Davis <gjimdavis@aol.com>, Dick Cacciapouti <rjcaccia@dukeengineering.com>, "Sonny26@hotmail.com" <Sonny26@hotmail.com>, Gil Brown <gilbert.brown@uml.edu>, Phil Connors <pconnors@mma.mass.edu>, Barbara Hubbard <byhubbar@dukeengineering.com>, "E. Taylor" <eltaylor1@dukeengineering.com>, Bill Rasin <whrasin@dukeengineering.com>, Heather Maclean <hmaclean@mit.edu>, Cherie Miles <Cherie_Miles@bedison.com>, Dennis Kuba <dkuba@entergy.com>, Jim Muckerheide-M1 <muckerheide@mediaone.net>, ans-pie@nuke-ans.org, rad-sci-l@ans.ep.wisc.edu, radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- References: <37D565F5.3BEF674D@bit-net.com>
Group,
The subject paper is on the web:
http://www.riskworld.com/Nreports/1999/jaworowski/NR99aa01.htm
More accurately: "Radiation Risk and the Lack of Ethics" :-)
Please forward to others (that support nuclear technologies rather than
defraud the public for cleanup $$ and other wasteful fear-mongering
exercises that severely constrain nuclear technologies).
Note also Jaworowski's papers as applied to the primary exposed
populations and biology at:
http://cnts.wpi.edu/RSH/Data_Docs/1-2/1/4/1214list.html
http://cnts.wpi.edu/RSH/Data_Docs/1-2/5/2/1/12521list.html
http://cnts.wpi.edu/RSH/Data_Docs/1-2/6/2/1262list.html
http://cnts.wpi.edu/RSH/Data_Docs/1-4/14list.html
http://cnts.wpi.edu/RSH/Data_Docs/1-5/15list.html
and on costs and conclusions at:
http://cnts.wpi.edu/RSH/Data_Docs/1-8/18list.html
http://cnts.wpi.edu/RSH/Data_Docs/1-9/19list.html
Thanks.
Regards, Jim Muckerheide
Radiation, Science, and Health
Center for Nuclear Technology and Society at WPI
Mass. State Nuclear Engineer
muckerheide@mediaone.net
http://cnts.wpi.edu/rsh/
================================================
William Machell wrote:
>
> Note: just resent this to correct an address and correct a couple
> typos. Don't seem to have correct addressess for Caciapouti and Gil
> Brown. Jim, got your answer and will mail a copy.
>
>
> Maybe many of you are up on this anyway, but there is a very
> interesting article in the September Physics Today by Zbigniew
> Jaworoski. " The established worldwide
> practice of protecting people from radiation costs hundreds of
> billions of dollars a year to implement and may well determine the
> world's future energy system. But is it right?" It discusses how
> politics got involved in establishing current practices, Why we have
> radiophobia, real effects of nuclear whatevers, why they should dump
> the no threshold, etc. He suggests that the curent population dose
> threshold could be 10 times higher.
> He is a professor Poland's Central Lab for Radological
> Protection and served on the UN Scientific Committee on Effects of
> Atomic Radiation.
> If this is not available to you I would send a copy. Just send
> an address.
>
> Bill Machell
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html