[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[4]: Patient Release - A Related Question
So, let's see, using the NRC's numbers, if I live near a nuclear power
plant for its nominal 30 year life, I can legally receive up to 100
mrem/y x 30 y = 3000 mrem. However, for cleanup, I can receive no more
than 25 mrem/y x 70 y = 1750 mrem. Still doesn't add up to me...
BTW, for those of you concerned with the amount of money being spent
on cleanup for little or no gain, there is a fascinating analysis of
the UMTRA mill tailings cleanup program in the May Health Physics
Journal (Vol. 76, No. 5) entitled "Calculation of the Number of Cancer
Deaths Prevented by the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action
Project." It analyzes 20 different project sites, and comes to the
conclusion that in only two was the cost/death prevented less than $1
million. Eight had a ratio exceeding $1 billion, with the highest
cost/death prevented being $18 Billion! Not a great use of public
resources.
Steven D. Rima, CHP, CSP
Manager, Health Physics and Industrial Hygiene
MACTEC-ERS, LLC
steven.rima@doegjpo.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Patient Release - A Related Question
Author: Stephen Mcguire <SAM2@nrc.gov> at Internet
Date: 11/2/99 10:48 AM
The justifications for the different limits for environmental cleanups and
patient release are a little subtle, but they come from the fact that
environmental pollutants may deliver a dose year after year, whereas a dose from
a patient that approaches the limit is likely to be a once in a lifetime event.
The 15 or 25 mrem/yr for environmental cleanup is driven in large part by the
EPA's judgement that the maximum acceptable lifetime risk from an environmental
pollutant is on the order of 10-6 to 10-4/lifetime. If we assume the annual
dose is delivered for 70 years those annual rates correspond to lifetime doses
of 1050 or 1750 mrem. These correspond to several times 10-4 risk, but the EPA
considers 15 mrem/yr to be close enough to 10-4 to be acceptable, but 25 mrem/yr
to be not considered by EPA to be close enough to be acceptable. NRC, on the
other hand, considers the risk from 25 mrem/yr to be close enough to be
acceptable.
However, the 10-4 criterion for acceptable lifetime risk applies only to
environmental pollutants, not necessarily to patient release. The acceptable
risk in that case is governed by the dose limits. Normally the maximum
acceptable annual dose to a member of the public is 100 mrem. However, in
certain cases 500 mrem can be accepted if there is justification and if the dose
is not likely to occur repeatedly to the same individual. The 500 mrem value
was adopted for patient release because there was considered to be justification
and a single individual would seldom receive a dose approaching that limit more
than once in a lifetime.
Thus, the basis for the limits is not exactly the same, but the results in terms
of lifetime risk are not that different either.
<snip>
Stephen A. McGuire
Mail Stop T-4D18
Incident Response Operations
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555
301-415-6204
sam2@nrc.gov
!
!
!
!
!
!
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html