[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gould's Tooth Fairy Project
Right Otto,
But of course it's also true for NCRP, ICRP, IAEA, NRC, DOE, EPA, etc.
etc. Can't blame Gould et al for the LNT fiction. Why not question the
source of the fiction?
Can't blame anti's, media, etc. for using our lies against us!
Why are we failing to respond? FRG#13 was accepted "lying down" despite
Otto's substantial efforts.
The US GAO is investigating the "justification" for using the LNT re the
voluminous contrary data. This is a big chance to initiate a fix this
fundamental failure. Who has communicated with them? (I'd appreciate
knowing. Not limited to US sources.)
Regards, Jim Muckerheide
Radiation, Science, and Health
muckerheide@mediaone.net
========================
"Otto G. Raabe" wrote:
>
> November 4, 1999
> Davis, CA
>
> Of course there is Sr-90 in baby teeth, but the amount is trivial and the
> dose to the skeleton is also trivial. However, to Gould, STAR, Sternglass,
> Cauldicott, et al., the presence of one atom of Sr-90 in a baby tooth is
> proof of an intolerable risk. Using EPA's Federal Guidance Report #13 they
> can even quantify the risk per atom of Sr-90 ingested.
>
> Otto
>
> *****************************************************
> Prof. Otto G. Raabe, Ph.D., CHP
> Institute of Toxicology & Environmental Health (ITEH)
> (Street address: Building 3792, Old Davis Road)
> University of California, Davis, CA 95616
> Phone: 530-752-7754 FAX: 530-758-6140
> E-mail ograabe@ucdavis.edu
> *****************************************************
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html