[ RadSafe ] Interesting Proposed Cigarette ProductWarning Labels

[McClung, Danny]

What is the radionuclide content of that "other smoking product" as compared to cigarette tobacco?

Dan McClung
Dept of Veterans Affairs
----------------------
Sent using BlackBerry


----- Original Message -----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu <radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu>
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Wed Nov 10 19:24:53 2010
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Interesting Proposed Cigarette ProductWarning	Labels

No wonder! Our government is addicted to tax dollars without regard to the 
source. Tobacco, alcohol and soon that "other smoking product" . To keep 
this on topic, what about hormesis and the radiation dose from smoking 
products?

George Andrews (personal ramblings)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Doug Aitken" <jdaitken at sugar-land.oilfield.slb.com>
To: "'Jerry Cohen'" <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; "'The International Radiation 
Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List'" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Interesting Proposed Cigarette ProductWarning 
Labels


> Of course, one wonders how a government can put such notices on an 
> article,
> and still permit its sale?
> Oh, I forgot. The tobacco industry...... and the taxes.....
>
> Let's instead spend billions to ensure that another smoking product with
> proven therapeutic value (to some) remains illegal....
> ;~)
> Doug (personal musing, only!)
>

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu