[ RadSafe ] RDD's etc.
Thompson, Dewey L
DThompson3 at ameren.com
Mon Feb 14 15:47:54 CST 2011
Is it Maury or the Dog that has that obvious load of common sense? (Or for that matter, is it Maury or the Dog that has the sense of humor?)
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
E DThompson3 at ameren.com
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Maury Siskel
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 3:41 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Cc: Doug Huffman
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] RDD's etc.
I may be seriously misguided, but it seems amusing (although
unfortunately involving serious beliefs) that discussion of terrorist
methods should be restricted for fear we would give them new ideas. How
condescending can one become? I'm very 'mischief oriented' and think
hard about ways to twist the tails of authority figures, (you know, pot
seeds in city hall flower beds or how to defeat city street cameras,
etc.) but dream up something 'truly original' from which 'they' might
benefit? Yes, all things are possible, but there are Seven Billion human
brains running around loose out there (e.g., crop circles and UFOs in
the night sky) -- that is an awesome number of fun and ideas.
Doug Huffman wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>This material is fundamental and required no particular prerequisites of
>any sort to receive. A precept was LNT dose-risk correlation.
>Who is the "We have agreed not to go into details out here in the
>open."? That seems to be the precise topic to which RadSafe is devoted.
> Noting the New London address, is there any chance that we are
>discussing with a newly separated USN engineering laboratory technician?
>After listening to the audio, viewing the presentation, and taking the
>knowledge assessment on this page, you will be able to do the following:
> * Identify radiological terror weapons
> * Describe the main risks from ionizing radiation
> * Identify the primary issues facing first responders
> * Define perimeters
> * Define "decision dose" and provide numerical values associated with it
> * Identify main medical management approaches
>On 2/14/2011 07:23, GEOelectronics at netscape.com wrote:
>>Subject: RDD's etc.
>>According to a couple of updated courses I just retook:
>>Johns Hopkins/ Bloomberg School of Public Health; "Practical Aspects of
>>Preparing for, and Responding to, Radiological Terrorism" and
>"Radiation Terror 101"
>>We have agreed not to go into details out here in the open, so I'll bite my tongue and leave it at that.
>>My main contribution is detection methodology. Because of this I tend to think
>>about scenarios that circumvent our equipment.
>>New London Nucleonics Lab
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Note that any views or opinions presented in this message are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ameren. All e-mails are subject to monitoring and archival. Finally, the recipient should check this message and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Ameren accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting the material from any computer. Ameren Corporation
More information about the RadSafe