[ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima

Busby, Chris C.Busby at ulster.ac.uk
Thu Jun 23 14:41:57 CDT 2011




-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Busby, Chris
Sent: Thu 23/06/2011 20:28
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima
 



-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of franz.schoenhofer at chello.at
Sent: Thu 23/06/2011 13:58
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List; The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
Cc: Busby, Chris
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima
 
Anoither unbelievable message of Chris Busby about deaths.
Again: Shame on you!, what I am still missing is a caldulation of how many US-citizens (others are obviously of miuch less ijmportance)  might be affected. 

Still anybody supporting this universal scientist? 

Bes regards, 

Franz






---- "Busby schrieb:
> You say that we have to wait for the Fukushima deaths. Well, I can assure
> you 100% there will be deaths in Fukushima, whether there was an accident or
> not. Some die from natural causes, some from genetic causes, some from
> lifestyle selections. They will all die. Did they die from Fukushima. No.
> Will they all be counted as deaths from Fukushima. Yes. Is that credible?
> How will you and your colleagues define what is Fukushima related or not.
> Individuals who have died in the last month, did they die from Fukushima? I
> seriously doubt that. How about in a month, 6 months, a year, 5 years?
> 
> In the end, you'll hold your opinion and I'll hold mine. Mine is like my
> politics. I don't follow like sheep. I make my own educated decisions. In
> some cases I agree with the conservatives, some with the liberals and mostly
> moderate. I don't follow the trend, I assess each case individually. Same
> here. If there are issues in my profession, I speak out, just go back the 15
> or so years I've been on radsafe. I call it like I see it. Am I always of
> the correct opinion? No. but I learn when facts, irrefutable facts are
> presented.
> 
> The Chernobyl and Fukushima numbers thrown out, not a chance!

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu


Deear Franz
The quotation you respond to is not mine.
You are becoming confused.
Maybe you are getting old.
Cheers
Chris 

Cant do the calculation about US citizens; not enough data.
C


More information about the RadSafe mailing list