[ RadSafe ] San Onofre nuclear plant -- please don't forget tovote -- link to story & poll repeated below

Maury maurysis at peoplepc.com
Fri Jun 22 15:12:03 CDT 2012


Emphatically, yes -- either exercise it or it will atrophy. A poll is 
just just one form of voting

now: 35 to 60.    [3PM Friday]   Have a little Friday fun <g>
Best,
Maury&Dog
PS Please try not to judge scientific knowledge too harshly based on fun 
........

========================================

On 6/22/2012 2:29 PM, Perle, Sandy wrote:
> Simple answer would be to simply move on and don't click on a vote, since
> it doesn't matter. Eh! In your infinite wisdom what you fail to understand
> is that public opinion can be swayed by other public opinion. I guess in
> America the right to vote is exercised, but perhaps you're sued to a
> situation where votes don't mean anything, just perhaps, I don't know.
> Just a thought.
>
> To those of you who have read the article and voted, please continue to do
> so. Millions of people read the LA Times, and San Onofre is getting a lot
> of press due to the S.G leaks, so, public opinion does count, with the
> politicians as well as utility executives, who have to make financial
> decisions. The people have a right to vote, and they should. Period!
>
> -----------------------------------
> Sander C. Perle
> President
> Mirion Technologies
> Dosimetry Services Division
> 2652 McGaw Avenue
> Irvine, CA 92614
>   
> +1 (949) 296-2306 (Office)
> +1 (949) 296-1130 (Fax)
>   
> Mirion Technologies: http://www.mirion.com/
>   
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/22/12 11:55 AM, "franz.schoenhofer at chello.at"
> <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at> wrote:
>
>> RADSAFERS,
>>
>> I am disappointed - I would have esteemed your scientific knowledge much
>> higher! This "voting" is just complete nonsense. It does not give any
>> information on a wide opinion of different people. I do not know the
>> background of this "voting", but it is not only biased, it is bluntant
>> manipulated. It is like voting in the USA whether islam should be banned
>> in the USA or in Saudi Arabia whether Christian religion should be banned
>> in their country (BTW, it is banned).
>>
>> So what is the statistical significance of such "voting"? Answer: Zero.
>>
>> I believe that RADSAFE should not engage in such ridiculous actions.
>>
>> Franz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---- Maury <maurysis at peoplepc.com> schrieb:
>>> And certainly no claims made for opinion assessment. Just a bit of fun
>>> to see more votes cast for 'our side' (57%)  than for the opponents'
>>> side (38%)  -- however it might have come about ... <g>
>>> Best,
>>> Maury&Dog  [MaurySiskel  maurysis at peoplepc.com]
>>>
>>> ===============================
>>>
>>> On 6/20/2012 12:07 PM, Donald Kosloff wrote:
>>>> If you can't remember if you voted on a particular day, don't worry,
>>> go ahead and vote.  If you already voted on that day from that computer,
>>> the poll will remind you that your vote for the day from that computer
>>> has already been counted.  These kinds of polls are set up for the
>>> Chicago voting method.
>>>> Don Kosloff
>>>> License Renewal Engineer
>>>> Oak Harbor OH
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 20, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Maury <maurysis at peoplepc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-san-onofre-nuclear-2
>>> 0120611,0,4282835.story
>>>>> At midnight CDT:  Close it 47.8% 1796 votes
>>>>>           Repair & re-open it 47.3%  1776 votes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> At 0215 CDT   Close it  47.4%  1797 votes
>>>>>         Repair & Re-open  47.6%  1803 votes
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>>> settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>>
>>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>> Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2437/5081 - Release Date:
>>> 06/20/12
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>
>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>
>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> --
>> Franz Schoenhofer, PhD, MinRat
>> Habicherg. 31/7
>> A-1160 Vienna
>> Austria
>> mobile: ++43 699 1706 1227
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2437/5084 - Release Date: 06/21/12
>
>




More information about the RadSafe mailing list