[ RadSafe ] Safety and Security of Commercial Spent NuclearFuelStorage: P...

JOHN.RICH at sargentlundy.com JOHN.RICH at sargentlundy.com
Tue Mar 26 14:34:50 CDT 2013


Hey everybody, 
The "B.5.b" exercise (Interim Compensatory Measure (ICM) B.5.b) was 
intended to ensure that every site could get water to the spent fuel pool 
and reactor containment under any condition including terrorist  type of 
damage.  Each site went through a pretty detailed process of determining 
how to get water to where it could be needed without having the usual 
supplies available.  We looked at the ultimate heat sink, nearby rivers, 
even waste water ponds (nothing was left out of consideration).  The NRC 
guidance and reviews were pretty solid on this one.  So, not having read 
the NAS report, I can't comment on how the "B.5.b" measures were 
incorporated (or ignored)  but I'd be real surprised if the report 
discovered any new vulnerabilitys.
 - - jmr

John Rich
312-269-3768



From:   JPreisig at aol.com
To:     radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Date:   03/26/2013 01:17 PM
Subject:        Re: [ RadSafe ] Safety and Security of Commercial Spent 
NuclearFuelStorage: P...
Sent by:        radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu



Hmmmmm,
 
     A well-trained terrorist would put spent fuel  bundles into a 
shielding container and would then move the spent fuel  bundles. 
Processing the 
bundles later on might be tricky.  Hope they  at least go through some 
sort of 
gastrointestinal phase of radiation  sickness...
 
    Joe Preisig
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 3/26/2013 2:01:20 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
cary.renquist at ezag.com writes:

Ahh, but  one must assume that there are an infinite number of terrorists
to carry  the fuel bundle...

---
Cary  Renquist
cary.renquist at ezag.com

-----Original Message-----
From:  radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu]  On Behalf Of Brennan, Mike
(DOH)
Sent: Tuesday, 26 March 2013 9:34  AM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics)  MailingList
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Safety and Security of Commercial  Spent
NuclearFuelStorage: Public Report

" The book explains it would  be difficult for terrorists to steal enough
spent fuel to construct a  significant radiological dispersal device."

I would love to see how far  the terrorists get, trying to carry a fresh
spent fuel bundle.  I  don't think they actually make it all the way to
the parking lot before  they start feeling not-so-good. 


-----Original  Message-----
From:  radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu]  On Behalf Of Cary Renquist
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:25 AM
To:  radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Safety and Security of  Commercial Spent Nuclear
FuelStorage: Public Report

NAS report on  safety and security of spent fuel:
http://j.mp/YRHuFU

All NAS  documents can now be downloaded for free.

In response to a request from  Congress, the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and the Department of Homeland  Security sponsored a National
Academies study to assess the safety and  security risks of spent nuclear
fuel stored in cooling pools and dry casks  at commercial nuclear power
plants. The information provided in this book  examines the risks of
terrorist attacks using these materials for a  radiological dispersal
device. Safety and Security of Commercial Spent  Nuclear Fuel is an
unclassified public summary of a more detailed  classified book. The book
finds that successful terrorist attacks on spent  fuel pools, though
difficult, are possible. A propagating fire in a pool  could release
large amounts of radioactive material, but rearranging spent  fuel in the
pool during storage and providing emergency water spray systems  would
reduce the likelihood of a propagating fire even under severe  damage
conditions. The book suggests that additional studies are needed  to
better understand these risks. Although dry casks have advantages  over
cooling pools, pools are necessary at all operating nuclear power  plants
to store at least the recently discharged fuel. The book explains  it
would be difficult for terrorists to steal enough spent fuel  to
construct a significant radiological dispersal device.

Congress  requested that the National Academies produce a classified
report that  addresses these charges within 6 months and also provide an
unclassified  summary for unlimited public distribution. The first
request was fulfilled  in July 2004. This report fulfills the second
request.

The  highlights of the report are as follows:

Spent fuel pools  are necessary at all operating nuclear power plants
to store recently  discharged fuel.

The committee judges that successful  terrorist attacks on spent fuel
pools, though difficult, are  possible.

If an attack leads to a propagating zirconium  cladding fire, it
could result in the release of large amounts of  radioactive material.

Additional analyses are needed to  understand more fully the
vulnerabilities and consequences of events that  could lead to
propagating zirconium cladding fires.

It  appears to be feasible to reduce the likelihood of a zirconium
cladding  fire by rearranging spent fuel assemblies in the pool and
making provision  for water-spray systems that would be able to cool the
fuel, even if the  pool or overlying building were severely damaged.

Dry  cask storage has inherent security advantages over spent fuel
pool storage,  but it can only be used to store older spent fuel

There  are no large security differences among different  storage-cask
designs.

It would be difficult for  terrorists to steal enough spent fuel from
storage facilities for use in  significant radiological dispersal devices
(dirty  bombs).



Cary
--
Cary.renquist at ezag.com
_______________________________________________
You  are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a  message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules.  These can be found  at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on  how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit:  http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You  are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a  message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules.  These can be found  at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on  how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit:  http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You  are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a  message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
the RadSafe rules.  These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For  information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
visit:  http://health.phys.iit.edu

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu



More information about the RadSafe mailing list