[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
we're still our own worse enemy
I attended a workshop last evening on the JCO criticality accident
and criticality accidents in general. During the presentation several
items caught my eye, and more importantly, my disdain. It was pointed
out that the JCO facility where the accident took place was now being
shielded for high energy photons. This is being done AFTER the
accident, and where there is no current exposure outside the
facility. We were also told that many of the fields and crops in the
area were being surveyed, although the criticality accident involved
no off-site particulate type release, that could cause ground
contamination. When asked why this was being done, it was discussed
that this made the public "feel better" and they would be happy that
appropriate actions were being taken.
It was also discussed that many states here also monitored for
radioactive plumes to ensure that there was no potential public risk.
Granted, this was done initially when the media informed everyone,
with pictures of the blown out roof, that there was a release taking
place. I don't have a problem with that. I do have a problem when the
monitoring continued after it was known that all that was involved,
was a criticality accident, where the only risk to the public was
from direct radiation, and only out to a radius of approximately 300
meters.
The discussion went further, where it was stated that if this
accident occurred here in the USA at a DOE facility, that we too
would initiate ground and crop surveys, vehicle surveys etc, to make
the public "feel good" that appropriate actions are being taken.
If we, radiation specialists, take these kinds of unnecessary action,
simply to make the public feel better, we are more at fault to
promote the mis-information about radiation accidents, radiation
exposure and radiation risks, than we can ever blame any other
factor. To do so is unethical, and only causes further damage to what
we scientists know as fact, and allows emotions to dictate policy
even further. In the end, the public, in the USA, will be no more pro-
nuclear by these actions being taken, compared to no actions being
taken. We ARE our own worse enemy. Time for a Sanity Check!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100
Director, Technical Extension 2306
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Division Fax:(714) 668-3149
ICN Biomedicals, Inc. E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Personal Website: http://www.geocities.com/scperle
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html