Re: radiation is radiation? lochbaum

["Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@earthlink.net>]

> And guys and gals, I have to confess as well that, despite all of your best
> intentions and explanations, I still don't get it either.

The issue isn't a rem = rem, rather that the specific energy of a 
specific decay product, be it a low or high energy photon, beta 
particle, alpha or neutron, is the same, regardless of its origin. In 
other words, if you have a naturally recurring isotope that has a 140 
keV x-ray, and, you have a power reactor release an effluent that has 
a 140 keV x-ray, they are one and the same. There is no difference. 
Perhaps David Lochbaum's reply was based on a misunderstanding as to 
what the question was, and what the responses were.

In the end, a gamma, x-ray, beta, neutron or alpha release or 
exposure, for the same energies, are equivalent. There is no 
misunderstanding regarding this.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle					Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100   				    	
Director, Technical				Extension 2306 				     	
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Division		Fax:(714) 668-3149 	                   		    
ICN Biomedicals, Inc.				E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net 				                           
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue  		E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com          	          
Costa Mesa, CA 92626                                      

Personal Website:  http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/1205
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html