[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Toothfairy strikes again....



Ahah! Just as I suspected.  Cancer causes Sr-90.


-----Original Message-----
From: Frank R. Borger_(FRB) <frb@gammex.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Toothfairy strikes again....


>Folks,
>
>If you follow back to the cited paper, its a rehash of old plots (er
garbage,) from 1954 to 1970
>
>No reputable scientist would plot SR-90 in baby teeth in St Louis versus
childhood cancer incidence in Connecticut. (Hmm, maybe Connecticut IS
downwind of St Louis.)
>
>Interestingly enough, that plot, and a similar plot of dietary uptake of
Sr90 in NYNY versus the same plot of cancer rates in Connecticut both show
the cancer rate plot LEADING the SR90 plot, rather than lagging, by a factor
of 3-4 years.
>
>
>Frank R. Borger - Physicist, Gammex RMI
>fborger@gammex.com   phn: 608-828-7289 fax: 608-828-7500
>These opinions are strictly mine, and not those of Gammex RMI
>"One third of the rats were improved on the experimental
>medication, one third remained the same, and the other one
>third could not be reported on, because that rat got away."
>- Edwin Bidwell Wilson
>
>
>************************************************************************
>The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
>information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html