[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
by imo-m10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.10.) id a.e3.13ec780e (4318);
Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <e3.13ec780e.281b4f56@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:40:22 EDT
Subject: Re: Established, mainstream, orthodox, and august organizations
To: Gerald.Falo@apg.amedd.army.mil, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="part1_e3.13ec780e.281b4f56_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10523
Sender: owner-radsafe@"list.vanderbilt.edu"
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: RuthWeiner@aol.com
--part1_e3.13ec780e.281b4f56_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Peer-reviewed publication used to be the "gold standard" for science, and as
far as I am concerned it's the best standard we have. Not that it's always
great -- there is occasional stuff in the journals I subscribe to that is
pure nonsense -- but it's all there is. That and one's own scientific
knowledge. And when I hear that stuff about "you can't trust stuff that the
government paid for" I just tell the person "too bad. I can't help what you
will or won't trust." There is no effective counter to the argument "I
don't
trust -- or believe..." i think the "trust" question is mostly a smoke
screen and last-ditch stand for people who strongly suspect that they
themselves are wrong.
Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
ruthweiner@aol.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.