[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Purpose of the List
Hi Patrick
Does this criticism only apply to me, your friendly anti-nuker, or does it apply
to ALL radsafers who post news articles or other non-technical, opinion pieces?
Just curious, because other radsafers DO post similar stuff at times.
My posting of that press release was meant to inform you all how your friends at
the DOE are giving in to this hysteria over security. Had I had a newspaper
article I would have posted that instead of NIRS's obviously slanted press
release. I mean, of course, any one's press release will be slanted towards their
own cause. NEI has never issued a slanted press release??
Anyway I felt that what I posted was within the bounds of radsafe's mission.
If I was wrong, apologies.
Back to lurkdom.
peace
norm
Patrick Muldoon wrote:
> "Self-serving claptrap. The "Nuclear Information & Resource Service"
> is not objective source of news. It is an entity of antinuclear activist
> organizations, is promoted as an antinuclear information service, and is
> privately funded by contributions by antinuclear supporters. As such, it
> cannot be regarded as an objective and balanced source of information.
> We oug
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.