[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reactor Containments and Terrorist Attacks



<<And we should also keep repeating until people tire of it, that Chernobyl

killed 30 people, not 30,000 (see UNSCEAR 2000).>>



Just one clarification--those (34) people were firefighters, not members of

the general public.



Jack Earley

Radiological Engineer



Enercon Services, Inc.

6525 N. Meridian, Suite 503

OKC, OK  73116

phone: 405-722-7693

fax:       405-722-7694

jearley@enercon.com



************************************************************************

This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Enercon Services, Inc.

proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to

copyright belonging to Enercon Services, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely

for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  If you

are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that

any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the

contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be

unlawful.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the

sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this

e-mail and any printout.

----- Original Message -----

From: "Ted Rockwell" <tedrock@CPCUG.ORG>

To: "Franz Schoenhofer" <franz.schoenhofer@CHELLO.AT>; "Norman Cohen"

<ncohen12@HOME.COM>; <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Sent: October 10, 2001 12:02 p.m.

Subject: RE: Reactor Containments and Terrorist Attacks





> > What is more propaganda, what causes more

> confusion of stock exchanges, industry, people

>

> Franz:

>

> In a rational world, an attack on either a spent fuel pool or a reactor

> containment would be reported on an inner page of the papers, stating that

> some damage was done to the facility, but there was no public hazard.

>

> However, in the world we live in, people in the nuclear community have

> generally supported the idea that radioactivity is a uniquely hazardous

> activity, noting that you can't see, hear, taste, smell or feel radiation

> (and neglecting to point out that radiation is uniquely easy to detect

> compared with chemical or biological hazards).  So we fuel the panic and

the

> news media love it.  This could in fact aid the terrorists by creating

some

> terrible headlines.

>

> The Lochbaums and Leventhals and Makhajanis spread the word, but the word

> they spread are based on the "safety scenarios" we have already created.

>

> It's worth noting that a potential hazard has two separable aspects:

> vulnerability and consequences.  If the consequences are not very severe

(as

> in a nuclear facility) then the vulnerability (how easy is it for a

saboteur

> to get in) becomes much less critical.  When people ask about

vulnerability

> of nuclear facilities, we should stress than we've done a pretty good job

> there, but the key fact is that a terrorist couldn't produce much of a

> hazard even if he had full run of the place.

>

> That attitude toward nuclear safety is completely opposite toward our

> attitude to date.  We have always assumed that if the dragon ever got out,

> he would devour the whole earth, but do not fear! we have him locked up in

a

> very strong cage.  By emphasizing containment, we create the impression

that

> TMI was a Chernobyl accident in a bottle.  If the bottle would break,

> thousands would die.  In fact, if containment was quite leaky, it is easy

to

> show that there still would have been little public hazard (assuming you

> don't equate public hazard with 4 mrem).  And we should also keep

repeating

> until people tire of it, that Chernobyl killed 30 people, not 30,000 (see

> UNSCEAR 2000).

>

> Ted Rockwell

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

>

>



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.