Re: Rad Worker Layoff??

["Glenn R Marshall" <grmarshall@knology.net>]

On Fri, 02 Nov 2001 12:05:45 EST, BLReider@AOL.COM wrote :





> The employee's case might be further strengthened if the TLD is not

really required for the job (ie, 10% dose limit expected to be received).



Oh, how simple that would be in a sensible world.  But unfortunately, we

live in the World of Nonsense.  My understanding is that ANI "recommends"

not one, but TWO dosimeters, one by a NVLAP certified dosimetry services

provider, for anyone expected to receive 100 mrem in a calendar year (2% of

the legal limit), and that meticulously-maintained records be kept until 30

years beyond license termination of every dosimeter reading and every entry

into an RCA.  Why?  To prove that monitoring was not required and dose

records were not required to be kept for those individuals.







************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.