RE: Cancer deficiency clusters

["Dov Brickner" <brickner@zahav.net.il>]

Howard and Ted

That's what I've been taught in "Research Methodology" cpurse few years

ago. I agree with the principle , but "power" of A research is not stictly

defined . You can always interpret the results indepedent of the author's

interpretation..



> Boy, that's a good one!  If no studies ever TRY to find

> benefits, then there

> are no proven benefits, and thus why would anyone ever finance a study of

> benefits?  That's the way it works, all right, but I never saw

> anyone baldly

> claim that that's the way it ought to be.



I didn't claim that's the way it should be. I think that every research in

rad epidemiology from the 90's should be designed to consider the

possibility of reduced cnacer incidence. I don't recall any study that was

designed that way but I have not read them all.





>

> Ted Rockwell

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text

> "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no

> subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

>

>





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/