[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Cancer deficiency clusters
Howard and Ted
That's what I've been taught in "Research Methodology" cpurse few years
ago. I agree with the principle , but "power" of A research is not stictly
defined . You can always interpret the results indepedent of the author's
interpretation..
> Boy, that's a good one! If no studies ever TRY to find
> benefits, then there
> are no proven benefits, and thus why would anyone ever finance a study of
> benefits? That's the way it works, all right, but I never saw
> anyone baldly
> claim that that's the way it ought to be.
I didn't claim that's the way it should be. I think that every research in
rad epidemiology from the 90's should be designed to consider the
possibility of reduced cnacer incidence. I don't recall any study that was
designed that way but I have not read them all.
>
> Ted Rockwell
>
> ************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text
> "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no
> subject line.
> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
>
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/